DocketNumber: 2015-08635
Judges: Rivera, Balkin, Dickerson, Hinds-Radix
Filed Date: 4/13/2016
Status: Precedential
Modified Date: 11/1/2024
People v Vizcarra |
2016 NY Slip Op 02796 |
Decided on April 13, 2016 |
Appellate Division, Second Department |
Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. |
This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports. |
Robert C. Mitchell, Riverhead, NY (James H. Miller III of counsel), for appellant.
Thomas J. Spota, District Attorney, Riverhead, NY (Glenn Green of counsel), for respondent.
DECISION & ORDER
Appeal by the defendant from an order of the County Court, Suffolk County (Kahn, J.), dated August 12, 2015, which, after a hearing, designated him a level two sex offender pursuant to Correction Law article 6-C.
ORDERED that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.
A defendant seeking a downward departure from the presumptive risk level has the initial burden of "(1) identifying, as a matter of law, an appropriate mitigating factor, namely, a factor which tends to establish a lower likelihood of reoffense or danger to the community and is of a kind, or to a degree, that is otherwise not adequately taken into account by the [Sex Offender Registration Act] Guidelines; and (2) establishing the facts in support of its existence by a preponderance of the evidence" (People v Wyatt, 89 AD3d 112, 128; see People v Gillotti, 23 NY3d 841, 861). If the defendant "surmounts the first two steps, the law permits a departure, but the court still has discretion to refuse to depart or to grant a departure" (People v Gillotti, 23 NY3d at 861; see People v Wyatt, 89 AD3d at 128).
Here, the County Court properly denied the defendant's request for a downward departure and, thus, properly designated him a level two sex offender (see People v Sadler, 124 AD3d 613; People v Houston, 122 AD3d 915).
RIVERA, J.P., BALKIN, DICKERSON and HINDS-RADIX, JJ., concur.
ENTER:Aprilanne Agostino
Clerk of the Court