Filed Date: 6/3/1952
Status: Precedential
Modified Date: 10/28/2024
It having been conceded upon the argument that for the purposes of this appeal the court could assume that the bail deposited was the property of the third party, the order is unanimously affirmed, with $20 costs and disbursements to the respondent. Present — Peck, P. J., Dore, Cohn and Callahan, JJ. [See post, p. 863.]