Judges: Patterson
Filed Date: 12/21/1906
Status: Precedential
Modified Date: 11/12/2024
This is an appeal from an order denying a motion to change the place of trial of this action from the county of New York to Mon- . roe county. The application seems to have been made on the ground -of the convenience of witnesses. The pleadings are not contained in the moving papers, but from the affidavits it would appear that the action is for goods-sold and delivered on two alleged contracts of sale. As to one the defendant admits liability, unless it may be as to, a credit for the amount of certain discount to which he claims he was entitled for the goods embraced in that cause of action. As to the second cause of action the defense'', is that goods were sent to the defendant which did not correspond with the samples by which they were sold.
It is apparent that the whole of the transaction having taken place at Bochester and the greater number of witnesses required in the case residing there, the action should be tried there.
The order should be reversed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, arid the motion to change the venue granted, with' ten dollars costs.
Ingraham, McLaughlin, Clarke and Houghton' JJ., concurred..
Order reversed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion to change venue granted, with ten'dollars costs. Order filed.