WM. H. Frank Brewing Co. v. Mayor

PER CURIAM.

It seems to us.that the plaintiff was entitled to-the costs which had accrued prior to the time of granting the motion for consolidation. The order consolidating the actions should therefore have given to the plaintiff the right to tax such costs in each action as had accrued up to the -time of the malting of the motion.

The order should therefore be reversed, without costs, and the motion for consolidation granted, as above stated, without costs.