Rolle v. Rolle

Laughlin, J. (dissenting):

I am of opinion that the amendment of the phraseology of former section 1770 of the Code of Civil Procedure in re-enacting it in section 1168 of the Civil Practice Act was not intended to effect and did not effect an enlargement of the jurisdiction of the court in matrimonial actions, and I, therefore, dissent on Crouch v. Crouch (193 App. Div. 221).

Order so far as appealed from reversed and motion granted.