Filed Date: 7/1/1905
Status: Precedential
Modified Date: 10/26/2024
On the 22d day of July, 1904, a justice of the Municipal Court of the city of New York, sitting in the third judicial district of the
The facts developed upon the motion do not in our opinion make out a voluntary submission on the part of the plaintiff to the jurisdiction of the Supreme Court, and we think that an order remanding the cause may properly be made and ought to be made in order to leave no doubt as to the authority of the Municipal Court to proceed to a trial and determination of the action. We cannot concur with the contention in behalf of the respondent that the plaintiff’s proper remedy was to apply to the Municipal Court to vacate the order of removal, and if that application had been denied to appeal therefrom. There is no provision in the Municipal Court Act for an appeal from such an order.
The order under review should be reversed and the plaintiff’s motion granted.
Present — Hirschberg, P. J., Bartlett, Woodward, Jenks and Miller, JJ.
Order reversed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion granted, without costs.