Filed Date: 1/25/1968
Status: Precedential
Modified Date: 10/19/2024
The loss of plaintiffs’ property was from an automobile which at the time the loss occurred did not have “ actually in or upon such vehicle ” the designated custodian. Hence defendants are not liable, because the actual loss occurred under circumstances falling squarely within the exclusory clause. The order should be reversed, with $10 costs, and motion granted.
Concur — Street, J. P., Gold and Hofstadter, JJ.
Order reversed, etc.