Judges: Giedersleeve
Filed Date: 12/23/1904
Status: Precedential
Modified Date: 11/12/2024
This is one of the ordinary actions to recover damages for personal injuries alleged to have been caused by the negligence of the defendant." The only question presented is whether or not the plaintiff was in any way guilty of contributory negligence. Plaintiff was riding upon the running board of an open car, and while in this position was hit upon the leg by coming in contact with the shaft of a wagon which was standing alongside of the track. He had boarded an east-bound Grand street' car at Third avenue. When he got on the car it was crowded, and he claims he was obliged to stand upon the running board if he desired to ride. It was about 6 p. m. in May, and was still light. The car was proceeding at its usual rate of speed, and the plaintiff testifies that he stood upon the running board for several blocks, looking inside the car, and did not see the wagon until he was struck. He did not look ahead of the car at all, and took not the slightest care .to observe whether or not the car approached objects standing in the street in such'proximity to the car as to make danger obvious. He elected to ride upon the running board, and in a place of danger, and while in such a position,
Judgment reversed and new trial ordered, with costs to the appellant to abide the event. All concur.