Filed Date: 12/11/1906
Status: Precedential
Modified Date: 11/12/2024
Upon a disputed question of fact, material and pertinent, to wit, were the goods taken under the writ of replevin the goods covered by the chattel mortgage, the court excluded evidence fairly tending to negative such proposition. This was clearly error.
Judgment reversed, and new trial ordered, with costs to appellant to abide the event.