Buchanan v. Provident Loan Society

PER CURIAM.

The complaint in stibstance alleges that in March and April, 1907, plaintiff delivered to the Provident' Loan Society certain articles of jewelry as a pledge or pawn, of the value of $2,000, to be held, and returned, on demand, upon payment of the amount loaned, with lawful interest; that, prior to the commencement of this action, demand for the return of said articles was made, and refused on the ground that said society had been notified “by other person or persons” not’ to deliver said articles to the plaintiff; and, upon information and belief, that defendants Chandler, Beekman, and Buchanan claim some interest in said articles. The defendants Chandler, Beekman, and Provident Loan Society demur. The only ground of demurrer to be considered is that the complaint does not state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action-.

Construed liberally, this complaint is in conversion. The fact that the society issued its pawn tickets for the articles to the plaintiff sufficiently indicates their possession by plaintiff at the time of pawning and that said possession was presumably lawful. In view of the refusal of the society to deliver the articles for the reason stated in the complaint, no tender of the loan and interest was necessary. The society is sufficiently apprised of plaintiff’s claim.

While in the caption of the complaint the defendants Chandler and Beekman are sued as copartners, nevertheless the complaint does not allege a copartnership, and those defendants individually, with defendant Buchanan, are charged with claiming some interest in said articles. It is doubtful whether they are necessary parties; but, under section 447 of the Code of Civil Procedure, they are not improperly brought in, if they are the claimants to these articles.

The interlocutory judgment overruling the demurrer should be affirmed, with costs, and the defendants permitted to answer, upon payment within six days of the costs in this court and in the court below.