Lorenz v. Indemnity Insurance Co. of North America

Per Curiam.

It plainly appears that at the time of the “ robbery ” plaintiffs’ messenger or agent was not actually cognizant of the commission of the alleged felonious act as testified; indeed he was not aware of such act. The loss was not by reason of the “ robbery ” as defined in the policy.

The judgment should be reversed, with $30 costs, and complaint dismissed on the merits, with costs.

Pecoba, Edeb and Hecht, JJ., concur.

Judgment reversed, etc.