Jackson v. Bulifant

Per Curiam.

All of the sales, except those to Worth & Co. and Lewis Marks, were evidenced by written sales-notes drawn by plaintiff himself. From these sales-notes, it appears that the so-called sales were conditional upon the buyer’s approval of the goods. They did not approve them and consequently no sale was effected. The plaintiff earned no commissions upon these transactions. As to the Worth an’d Marks items, the evidence was conflicting and we see no reason to disturb the finding of the justice.

Present: Scott, P. J., Beach and Fitzgerald, JJ.

Judgment affirmed, with costs.