Citation Numbers: 36 Misc. 174, 73 N.Y.S. 164
Filed Date: 10/15/1901
Status: Precedential
Modified Date: 11/12/2024
While the defendant might -have successfully assailed the order for his examination in supplementary' proceed
The defendant evidently intended no disrespect, for, having obtained an order from the Bankruptcy Court staying the plaintiff’s proceeding, he evidently believed that the function of the State court had come to an end. But the order was not served in time to prevent the default of the defendant to be noted, and, being in default, the Bankruptcy Court modified its stay by allowing the proceedings to punish for contempt to proceed to a hearing. This meant that the City Court might fine or imprison, if either was proper under the circumstances. The court imposed a fine of $250 and allowed $50 costs. The $250 imposed was the extreme limit of the law, no loss or damage having been proven. There was no adjustment of the items of the cost, but the $50 is imposed as a lump sum. We think that under the circumstances the fine, aggregating $300, was excessive against the bankrupt defendant, and was imposed on the erroneous theory that the contempt was willful, when it evidently was not, and that pecuniary loss had followed, and there was no proof of that.
The order must be reversed, unless the plaintiff, within ten days, stipulates to reduce the amount to fifty dollars and ten dollars costs; in that case, the order as modified will be affirmed, without costs in this court or in the court below.
Present: Freedman, P. J., McAdam and Gildersleeve, JJ.
Order reversed, unless plaintiff, within ten days, stipulates to reduce amount of fine to fifty dollars, with ten dollars costs; in that event, order as modified affirmed, without costs in this court or court below.