Citation Numbers: 94 Misc. 637, 158 N.Y.S. 565
Judges: Cohalan
Filed Date: 4/15/1916
Status: Precedential
Modified Date: 1/13/2023
The appellant insists that the moving papers on the motion to punish for contempt are insufficient in that while the order to show cause by which it was instituted contains sufficient recitals, certain of the recited papers were never served.
The only papers served upon the judgment debtor on the motion to punish for contempt were the order to show cause and an affidavit by the attorney for the judgment creditor, setting forth the taking of the judgment debtor’s default. The order to show cause, besides other recitals, contains a statement that it is based on the original order and affidavit, requiring the judgment debtor to appear, and the affidavit of service of the same.
This latter paper has never been served on the debtor and, although the other papers recited had been previously served and are referred to as being annexed to the order to show cause, they were not served upon the motion to punish for contempt.
It must be observed that in motions of this character the judgment debtor is entitled to notice of the precise claim that is being made against him and for what omission or misconduct he is to be punished. Each
Guy and Whitaker, JJ., concur.
Orders reversed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements.