Citation Numbers: 44 How. Pr. 152
Judges: Robinson
Filed Date: 6/15/1872
Status: Precedential
Modified Date: 2/5/2022
It was the duty of the appellants to see that the cause was restored to the calendar of the general term as part of the conditions upon which they were relieved from a former default. This they neglected to do, and respondents’ attorney, in accordance with that order, finding it omitted on the first day of the October general term, procured it to be so restored, and some days afterwards it was regularly called to a judgment of affirmance by default.
I regard this action as regular, and in consideration of this being a second motion to be relieved, regard it but proper to look into the merits presented by the justice’s return.
The note upon which a recovery was had was given by the defendant, McKenzie, to plaintiff for repairs they had done to his wagon, and on their refusal to surrender their lien on it except upon the security of a good indorser.
Under such circumstances their liability is well established by the court of appeals in Moore agt. Cross, (19 N. Y., 227.)
Their appeal is without merits, and this application to be again relieved from a fault must be denied with $10 costs.