UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK IN RE FOREIGN EXCHANGE BENCHMARK : 13 Civ. 7789 (LGS) RATES ANTITRUST LITIGATION : : ORDER LORNA G. SCHOFIELD, District Judge: WHEREAS, on April 30, 20201, pursuant to the Court’s November 12, 2020, Order (Dkt. No. 1544), the parties filed cross-motions for summary judgment. WHEREAS, on April 30, 2021, the Credit Suisse Defendants filed a letter motion to seal portions of the parties’ papers in support of or opposition to the cross-motions for summary judgment. The letter motion states that “Plaintiffs have advised [the Credit Suisse Defendants] that they intend to propose narrower redactions than the proposed redactions set forth in Appendix A,” and requests leave to file any opposition to Plaintiffs’ motion to seal by May 7, 2021. Dkt. No. 1572. WHEREAS, on April 30, 2021, Plaintiffs filed a letter-motion to seal portions of the parties’ papers in support of or opposition to the cross-motions for summary judgment, proposing more narrow redactions than those proposed in the Credit Suisse Defendants’ letter motion at Docket No. 1572. Dkt. No. 1578. It is hereby ORDERED that, by May 13, 2021, Defendants shall file any opposition to Plaintiffs’ more narrow redactions. Any opposition shall include a revised version of the chart provided in Appendix A of Plaintiffs’ letter motion, with a column stating Defendants’ position as to why more extensive redactions or sealing is warranted in light of the “strong presumption of access” that attaches to judicial documents. See Lugosch v. Pyramid Co. of Onondaga, 435 F.3d 110, 121 (2d Cir. 2006). Dated: May 3, 2021 New York, New York LORNA G. SCHOFIEL Flerrmnm Gemrammna Firomniren Tromeor