UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT ELECTRONICALLY FILED DOC #: _________________ SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK DATE FILED: 8/18/2022 ----------------------------------------------------------------- X : TYRIEK GIBSON, : : Plaintiff, : 1:21-cv-04251-GHW : -against - : ORDER : THE STATE OF NEW YORK; THE : DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTION; : CAPTAIN ROBINSON; CAPTAIN : REYES; C.O. LOPEZ; DEPARTMENT : OF CORRECTION SUPERVISORS, : : Defendants. : ----------------------------------------------------------------- X GREGORY H. WOODS, United States District Judge: On August 3, 2022, Magistrate Judge Moses issued a Report and Recommendation (“R&R”) recommending that the Court dismiss this action without prejudice pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b). Dkt. No. 18 at 6. In that R&R, Magistrate Judge Moses determined that the action should be dismissed because of Plaintiff’s failure to prosecute this case and Plaintiff’s failure to comply with court orders. See id. at 1. A district court reviewing a magistrate judge’s report and recommendation “may accept, reject, or modify, in whole or in part, the findings or recommendations made by the magistrate judge.” 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). Parties may raise specific, written objections to the report and recommendation within fourteen days of receiving a copy of the report. Id.; see also FED. R. CIV. P. 72(b)(2). The Court reviews for clear error those parts of the report and recommendation to which no party has timely objected. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(A); Lewis v. Zon, 573 F. Supp. 2d 804, 811 (S.D.N.Y. 2008). No objection to the R&R was submitted within the fourteen-day window. The Court has reviewed the R&R for clear error and finds none. See Braunstein v. Barber, No. 06 Civ. 5978 (CS) (GAY), 2009 WL 1542707, at *1 (S.D.N.Y. June 2, 2009) (explaining that a “district court may adopt those portions of a report and recommendation to which no objections have been made, as long as no clear error is apparent from the face of the record.”). The Court, therefore, accepts and adopts the R&R in its entirety. For the reasons articulated in the R&R, this action is dismissed without prejudice. The Clerk of Court 1s directed to mail a copy of this order to Plaintiff and to close this case. SO ORDERED. Dated: August 18, 2022 HH \\ La f New York, New York GRE . WOODS United States District Judge