UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK Su cn □□ meno oe FEIGE WIEDER and JOEL WIEDER, each - □□ ‘individually and as Parent and Guardian of Po SE BS □□ L.W., an Infant under the age of 18 years, Be pe Plaintiffs, fe /§-22 ORDER □□ V. : : 22 CV 10759 (VB) ADVANCED BIONICS CORPORATION, : ADVANCED BIONICS LLC, and SONOVA : USA INC., : Defendants. : re es ee nee en enn ene nse eee nn see ee X Plaintiffs bring this action invoking subject matter jurisdiction by reason of diversity of citizenship under 28 U.S.C. § 1332(a)(1). To invoke diversity jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1332, there must be complete diversity of citizenship. Caterpillar Inc. v. Lewis, 519 U.S. 61, 68 (1996). Thus, 28 U.S.C. § 1332 “applies only to cases in which the citizenship of each plaintiff is diverse from the citizenship of each defendant.” Id.; see also Lincoln Prop. Co. v. Roche, 546 U.S. 81, 89 (2005). Specifically, 28 U.S.C. § 1332(a)(1) applies when the dispute is between “citizens of different States.” A limited liability company has the citizenship of each of its individual or entity members. Handelsman v. Bedford Vill. Assocs. Ltd, P’ship, 213 F.3d 48, 51-52 (2d Cir. 2000). Regarding defendant Advanced Bionics LLC, the complaint alleges it “is located” in Valencia, California (Doc. #1 (“Compl.’’) § 2), and that it is “existing under and by virtue of the laws of the State of Delaware.” (Compl. J 25). Plaintiffs do not, however, identify the members of Advanced Bionics, LLC, or their citizenships. Accordingly, by January 25, 2023, plaintiffs’ counsel shall submit a letter explaining in detail the citizenship of the constituent members of Advanced Bionics, LLC, so the Court can determine whether it has subject matter jurisdiction. Dated: January 18, 2023 White Plains, NY SO ORDERED: Vincent L. Briccetti United States District Judge