Filed Date: 4/15/1881
Status: Precedential
Modified Date: 11/12/2024
Judgment of the County Court affirmed. Held, that the justice erred in overruling the objection made to the question put to the defendant as to the amount of damage he had sustained by the loss of the service of his horse, and that we cannot say that the testimony given in answer to the question did not harm the plaintiff. Also, that such error was sufficiently pointed out in the notice of appeal.