Citation Numbers: 68 Misc. 2d 317
Judges: Smith
Filed Date: 12/10/1971
Status: Precedential
Modified Date: 2/5/2022
Upon the court’s own motion, the memorandum decision heretofore rendered is recalled and the following shall constitute the decision of this court.
This is an application pursuant to CPLR article 78, for a judgment declaring null and void respondent’s suspension of petitioner’s public assistance grant, effective October 31, 1971.
Notice of the proposed suspension, dated October 12, 1971, was admittedly received by petitioner on October 14, 1971, and advised petitioner that, if she wished a review of the proposed action on October 18, 1971, she should write to respondent’s designated representative prior to that date. Stricken from the notice was the provision that petitioner might communicate her desire for review by telephone, and no telephone number was provided although the printed form (Form 227 Rev. 1/69 Notification-Discontinuance or Suspension) was designed to furnish such a number, and previous notices given to petitioner had, in fact, included a telephone number. The notice further stated: “If we do not hear from you before that date, we will assume that you understand the reason for discontinuing (or suspending) your assistance.” (Italics supplied.)
There has been no showing that petitioner communicated with respondent prior to October 18, 1971, but she claims that, by reason of illness on that date, she was unable to appear for review. It is her contention that on or about October 18, her daughter advised respondent by telephone of petitioner’s inability to attend and requested that the review be rescheduled. Respondent claims to have no record of the alleged telephone call.
Accordingly, petitioner is entitled to judgment, vacating respondent’s action in suspending her public assistance grant and directing that her assistance payments be continued, pending a review of the proposed suspension, to be conducted before a representative of respondent not later than December 15, 1971.