Judges: Conway
Filed Date: 4/12/1979
Status: Precedential
Modified Date: 10/19/2024
OPINION OF THE COURT
This is an article 78 proceeding in which petitioner seeks judgment requiring the respondent, Commissioner of the Department of Transportation to grant access to petitioner of the records in his custody in connection with his investigation into an accident caused by a public vehicle in which petitioner and her decedent husband suffered personal injuries.
Petitioner was involved in an accident on May 14, 1978, in the Town of Seneca Falls, when a bus owned by the Bluebird Coach Lines, Inc., struck the rear of an automobile in which petitioner and her husband were passengers, causing petitioner to sustain severe personal injuries and her husband, fatal injuries.
The police accident report indicated certain facts suggesting possible brake failure of the bus, and the Motor Vehicle Department held a public hearing with regard to the accident.
Respondent contends that the information sought is not available under the Freedom of Information Law or any other law. The court cannot agree with the contentions of the respondent.
Subdivision 8 of section 142 of the Transportation Law, relied on by the respondent, gives the respondent the power to investigate the cause of all accidents resulting in loss of life or injury to persons which in his judgment shall require investigation. "Every bus company shall give immediate notice to the commissioner of every accident to which it shall in the course of its operations have been a party, but such notice shall not be admitted as evidence, or used for any purpose against such bus company in any action or proceeding for damages growing out of any such accident.”
This statutory provision does not specifically bar the respondent from disclosing the records requested by the petitioner but only bars the notice given by the bus company of the accident pursuant to the statute. As a matter of fact, section 83 of the Transportation Law provides that all proceedings of the commissioner in relation to functions and powers possessed by the commissioner and all records in his possession relating thereto shall be public.
The Linton v Lehigh Val. R. R. Co. case (25 AD2d 334), relied on by the respondent, is distinguishable from the case at bar and was decided prior to the Freedom of Information Law.
Further, it is in the public interest, in this court’s opinion, to grant disclosure. The more light shed upon the operations of public vehicles on public highways the better. The petition is granted.