Citation Numbers: 52 Misc. 2d 829
Judges: Markewich
Filed Date: 1/13/1967
Status: Precedential
Modified Date: 1/7/2022
Petitioner moves to punish the respondent for contempt for violation of a writ of habeas corpus with respect to payments for the support of an infant and for counsel fee on this determination. Respondent cross-moves to vacate the arrears and to reduce the payments.
Section 240 of the Domestic Relations Law empowers the court to make an allowance for the care of a child in a habeas corpus proceeding. Such was done in this case. However, the only orders which may be enforced by contempt pursuant to section 245 of the Domestic Relations Law are those issued as an adjunct to a matrimonial action; an order issued in a habeas corpus proceeding is not included therein. In this connection it is noted that no support of a child or counsel fee was allowed in a habeas corpus proceeding prior to the enactment of sections 237 (subd. [b]) and 240 of the Domestic Relations Law. However the enforcement of an order in habeas corpus was not included in section 245. In the absence of such statutory authority, this court may not punish for contempt. It appears to the court that
Accordingly, the motion and cross motion are denied without prejudice to such application as petitioner is advised to make.