Citation Numbers: 171 Misc. 207
Judges: Fbankenthaleb
Filed Date: 4/11/1939
Status: Precedential
Modified Date: 1/12/2023
Four applications, two by creditors’ committees of Land Estates, Incorporated, and Liberdar Holding Corporation, respectively (hereinafter referred to as “ Land Estates ” and “ Liberdar ”), and two by the Superintendent of Insurance, as liquidator of New York Title and Mortgage Company (hereinafter referred to as “the title company”), have been consolidated into one proceeding. Those by the Superintendent of Insurance seek approval by this court (1) of the Superintendent’s execution of agreements with said creditors’ committees and the primary and ancillary receivers of Land Estates and Liberdar, which, if approved by the Federal court, will terminate the Federal equity receiverships of Land Estates and Liberdar which have been in existence for about five and one-half years, and (2) of settlement agreements disposing of all claims and liabilities owing from Land Estates and Liberdar to the Superintendent, as liquidator of the title company, and vice versa. The applications of the creditors’ committees have for their object this court’s approval of the agreements entered into by them with the Superintendent of Insurance, particularly in so far as such agreements affect trustees of certificated issues who have claims against Land Estates and Liberdar, said trustees having been designated in reorganization proceedings in this court and being subject to its jurisdiction. Additional relief is asked for in the motions made by the creditors’ committees, reference to which will be made presently.
Prior to August, 1933, Land Estates and Liberdar were subsidiaries of the title company, their business consisting primarily of taking title to and operating properties foreclosed by the parent company and accepting deeds to and operating properties obtained by the latter without foreclosure. Where there was a partial foreclosure the mortgage generally remained outstanding, and where there was a full foreclosure a new mortgage was ordinarily made to the parent company, which the latter either retained, or sold with its guaranty, or placed in a guaranteed certificated issue. On August 16, 1933, shortly after the title company was placed in
Proceedings for the determination of claims against each of the companies in receivership have already been had in the Federal court for the Southern District of New York, the primary jurisdiction. The reports of the special master appointed to hear the claims have been confirmed by the Federal court and the claims against each company, trust as well as general, have practically all been determined. The claims allowed against Land Estates aggregate $2,801,204.14, while the estimated realizable value of the assets available to meet them was, as of December 1,1938, only $921,287.46 (exclusive of certain unfixed administration charges). The claims allowed against Liberdar total $3,795,068.57, while the estimated realizable value of the assets available to meet them was, as of December 31, 1938, only $928,669.07 (exclusive of certain unfixed administration charges). The general (as distinguished from trust and preferred) claims against Land Estates total $2,591,973.39, of which $2,454,341.87 are held by trustees of certificated issues based on bonds of Land Estates. More than half of the general claims held by trustees of these certificated issues belong to the trustees of three series, C-2, F-l and BK, viz., $1,476,559.42. The general claims against Liberdar amount to $3,499,000.91, of which trustees of certificated issues based on bonds of Liberdar own $3,363,468.87. More than half of the general claims belonging to trustees are held by trustees of the three issues above referred to, C-2, F-l and BK, viz., $1,827,412.20.
When it became evident to the Superintendent of Insurance during the spring of 1938 that the allowable claims against each company would far exceed the assets available to meet them, he called a meeting of the larger creditors and informed them that he was
In view of the overwhelming sentiment of the creditors in favor of the two plans, the Superintendent entered into agreements for their adoption with the creditors’ committees of Land Estates and Liberdar, subject, however, to the approval of the Federal court and of this court. He now seeks this court’s approval of his execution of the agreements.
The general scheme of each plan is: (1) That those creditors who assent to its provisions are to bid for and purchase the assets of the company from the receiver at a price to be approved by the Federal court as fair, using the amounts payable to them as dividends on their claims in payment of the purchase price; (2) that the non-assenting creditors are to be paid in cash their proportionate shares of the price fixed or approved by the Federal court; and (3) that the assets of the company purchased by the assenting creditors are to be transferred to and administered and liquidated by a trustee, designated by and acting under a declaration of trust approved by this court.
The creditors’ committees have already received the consents and assignments of about ninety-six per cent of the general claims against Land Estates and Liberdar, as allowed by the Federal court. Trust and preferred claimants are to be paid in full the amounts of their claims as fixed by the Federal court and are accordingly not affected by the plans. Even as to these claims, however, the creditors’ committees hold consents and assignments of about fifty-five per cent of the claims in the case of one of the companies and about sixty-five per cent in the case of the other. Only three general creditors have filed objections, two of them holding general claims against Land Estates, aggregating $4,787.57, and the third, Prudential Insurance Company of America, holding a general claim against Liberdar for $10,962.69. The only other objection to the plans is that interposed by the stockholders’ committee of
The various objections to the plans require only brief discussion.
The contention is made that the proposed plans are unfair to unsecured general creditors, such as Prudential Insurance Company of America, in that the claims of the secured general 'creditors, who consist in the main of trustees of certificated issues, are allowed at their full face amounts without any deduction of the value of the collateral securing such claims. A short and decisive answer to this objection is that the fixation of claims by the Federal court having charge of the equity receiverships of Land Estates and Liberdar is necessarily conclusive upon this court as well as upon all the parties to the receiverships. Manifestly any distribution of the assets of any company in Federal receivership must be made in accordance with the claims as allowed by the Federal court which created and controls the receiverships. The proposed plans are predicated upon and recognize the binding effect of the orders of the Federal court pertaining to the allowance of claims against Land Estates and Liberdar. Each of them does, it is true, contain a provision that bond creditors “ whose claims have been measured on the basis of deducting therefrom the value of their said mortgage security” may under certain conditions “ be entitled to apply * * * for an order opening up the hearings on their claims, to which the parties hereto will consent, in order to fix such claims ” in the same manner as the claims of bond creditors whose claims were measured and allowed without deduction of the value of their security. This provision does not, however, obligate or purport to obligate the Federal court to alter its previous fixation of such reopened claims. It merely authorizes an application to be made to the Federal court and gives the consent of the parties to the granting of such application in order that all creditors similarly situated may receive uniformity of treatment. In the last analysis, however, it is the decisions and orders of the Federal court which are to control. In this connection it should be noted that the orders of that court allowing the various general claims contain a provision that “ dividends thereon to be limited to an amount which, together with the amounts realized from the respective securities, will not exceed the amount of the respective claims as so allowed.”
The claim is also made that in settling the claims of the title company against Land Estates and Liberdar on seemed bonds of the latter corporations held by the title company, the Superintendent of Insurance accepted an allowance of only the difference between the face amounts of the claims and the value of the collateral securing them. The objecting creditors urge that, therefore, the secured claims held by others than the title company should be measured in the same manner. Apart from the fact that this argument is a non sequitur, it should be pointed out that it appears to be based upon false factual assumptions. The special master had reported to the Federal court that Land Estates possessed an offset to the claims held by the title company against it in an amount exceeding such claims, the balance in favor of Land Estates being $1,001,311.88, and that Liberdar possessed a similar offset exceeding the claims of the title company against it by $134,139.89. For this reason and because of the further fact that a serious question existed as to whether the claims of the title company could be validly asserted against its own subsidiaries, in view of the character of the relationship and dealings which had existed between them, the Superintendent, as liquidator of the title company, felt justified in canceling all claims against the subsidiaries (other than certain claims for excess administration reserves held by the receivers, etc., which have been settled with the approval of the Federal courts for $98,000) in return for a cancellation and release by the subsidiaries of all claims against the parent company. The settlement appears to have been in no way influenced by or based upon
Creditors’ objections to various provisions of the proposed plans relating to such things as the expenses incurred and the powers of the creditors’ committees, the fixation of a date beyond which non-assenters are to be barred from participation in the plans, etc., are sufficiently answered by repeating what has already been pointed out, viz., that these provisions affect only those creditors who voluntarily assent to the plans. Nor is there any merit in the objection to the provision contained in each plan that in the case of a creditor who also holds a guaranty issued by the title company, the proceeds realized on his claim against Land Estates or Liberdar should be deemed additional collateral in computing his total claim against the title company in the proceedings for the liquidation of said company. This provision is eminently fair and proper and the court can conceive no valid objection thereto.
In considering the objections raised by creditors of Land Estates and Liberdar it is well to bear in mind that neither of these corporations is an insurance corporation under the jurisdiction of this court and that the fairness of the plans to creditors of said corporations is a matter for the exclusive determination of the Federal court having complete charge and jurisdiction of said corporations.
Various objections have been filed by the committee of stockholders of the title company. One of them, relating to the Superintendent’s alleged settlement of the title company’s claims against Land Estates and Liberdar on a basis less favorable than that upon which the claims of other creditors were fixed, has already been discussed. Objection is also made to the approval of the proposed plans on the ground that they are unfair to the title company as the sole stockholder of both Land Estates and Liberdar, and, therefore, are unfair to the stockholders of the title company. It is claimed that in reaching the conclusion that both Land Estates and Liberdar are insolvent and that nothing will be left for the title company as sole stockholder of Land Estates and Liberdar, the Superintendent of Insurance has failed to give adequate consideration to the amounts which have already been realized and which will hereafter be realized by the claimants on the collateral
The objection by the stockholders’ committee to the proposed settlement of the Superintendent’s claims against the receivers of Land Estates and Liberdar for excess administration reserves, etc., for $98,000, as inadequate, is not shown to posesss any merit. .Said settlement has been approved by the Federal courts in the Southern and Eastern Districts of New York and appears to be fair and reasonable.
i The granting- of the applications now before the court meets with the approval of all the creditors of Land Estates and Liberdar who are affected thereby, except three .general creditors whose total claims against both corporations amount to less than $16,000 out of over $6,000,000 of allowed claims. Both the Mortgage Commission and the Superintendent of Insurance are in favor of the applications. The only objections other than those of the three creditors above mentioned are those of stockholders of the title company, for whom in all probability there will never be any equity in any event.
The motions are granted, except that, as previously indicated, the plans are modified so as to provide that the turning over of the stock of Land Estates and Liberdar shall not deprive the Superintendent of Insurance, as sole stockholder of those companies, of the right to the amount, if any, by which the price approved by the Federal court may exceed the aggregate allowed claims of creditors. The cross-motion of the Prudential company to compel the Superintendent to petition the Federal court for certain directions to the receivers is denied.
Settle order.