Judges: Brunt, Daniels
Filed Date: 11/7/1889
Status: Precedential
Modified Date: 11/12/2024
I concur with Mr. Justice Daniels. The affidavit upon which the order was granted was wholly insufficient. The affidavit not only should not have been in the alternative, but it should have stated the facts upon which the affiant bases his allegation that the person to be examined either had property of the debtor or was indebted to him. An allega
Brady, J., concurs.