Citation Numbers: 26 N.Y.S. 150, 81 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 637, 57 N.Y. St. Rep. 272
Judges: Pratt
Filed Date: 12/1/1893
Status: Precedential
Modified Date: 1/13/2023
The proof shows that Solly bought the land with the understanding that it could be used for business purposes. We think the court below correctly held that under that description a liquor business should be permitted. It follows that Solly could not be required to accept a deed restricting him from selling liquors. His failure to object at once was sufficiently explained. Judgment affirmed, with costs. All concur.