Citation Numbers: 32 N.Y.S. 990, 92 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 210, 66 N.Y. St. Rep. 474, 85 Hun 210
Judges: Brien
Filed Date: 3/15/1895
Status: Precedential
Modified Date: 10/19/2024
It is insisted upon this appeal that the writ of certiorari should be quashed, because it appears that none of the grounds specified in the petition were presented to the assessors, .and those not specified must be considered waived, and because, upon the application to the assessors, the assessment as made was warranted by the facts disclosed. The question of the sufftciency of the petition and the return, we think, is disposed of adversely to the appellants by the case of People v. Tax Com’rs of City of New York, 144 N. Y. 483, 39 N. E. 385. As to "the facts disclosed
We think, therefore, that the order was right, and should be affirmed, with costs.