Filed Date: 9/15/1887
Status: Precedential
Modified Date: 11/3/2024
On March 21st, 1887, the petitioner herein recovered, in the Supreme Court, a judgment against the executor of this estate, in the sum of $1,349.22. The petitioner now asks leave, under § 1825 of the Code of Civil Procedure, to issue an execution for the enforcement of such judgment,
Section 1351 of the Code of Civil Procedure declares that, only where it is specially prescribed by law (and there is no special prescription in cases like the case at bar), does an appeal to the General Term operate, of itself, as a stay of the execution of the judgment appealed from, but such stay must be effected, if at all, by filing a proper undertaking or by procuring a direction of the court into or from which the appeal is taken, or of a judge thereof. Section 1312 provides that, where an appeal has been taken by an executor to the General Term, the court into or from which the appeal is taken may, in its discretion, and upon notice to the respondent, dispense with or limit the security.
I hold, therefore, that the mere fact of the pendency of this respondent’s appeal will not justify me in denying the petitioner’s application. A contrary view is taken in Curtis v. Stilwell (32 Barb., 354), cited by
Unless the respondent shall within ten days obtain a stay of proceedings, the petitioner may issue execution.