Document Info

Judges: Marcus

Filed Date: 4/15/1905

Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 11/12/2024

  • Marcus, S.

    This proceeding was commenced upon petition of the Buffalo State Hospital, a creditor of Frederick William *578Kluge, deceased, for the mortgage, lease or sale of the real property of said decedent for the payment of his debts and funeral expenses.

    It is urged by the counsel for the administrator that the Buffalo State Hospital has no authority to maintain this proceeding, and that the right, if any exist on account of the petitioner’s claim, is in the State of Hew York, and should be brought by its law officer, the attorney-general, who represents the State in all legal proceedings; and also upon the further ground that section 42 of the Insanity Law provides: The treasurer of any State hospital may bring an action in the name of the hospital, to recover for the use thereof,” etc., and that this limits the proceeding to be brought by or on behalf of a State hospital to an action at law, and prevents the bringing of a special proceeding, such as is here sought to be instituted.

    The administrator also invokes the authority of the Code,, sections 3338, 3334 and 3343, subdivision 20, which define the expressions action ” and “ special proceedings,” and distinguish them.

    These objections, however, cannot be sustained. The Constitution of this State provides that all corporations shall have the right to sue and shall be subject to be sued in all courts in like cases as natural persons.” Const., art. VIII, § 3.

    The Insanity Law, section 30, provides that There shall continue to be the following hospitals for the care and treatment of the poor and indigent insane of the State which are hereby declared to be corporations,” and among the hospitals, so named and designated is the Buffalo State Hospital. It is. thus clear that in the absence of any statutory prohibition, the Buffalo State Hospital, as a creditor, has the right to institute any proceeding in the courts of this State which an individual would have the right to institute; and where such hospital is a creditor, it must follow that it has the right to institute a proceeding for the sale of real estate for the enforcement of an in*579debtedriess in its favor against the estate of a. decedent where the same fants exist that entitle an individual to such remedy.

    Section 42, which is cited on behalf of the administrator in opposition to this proceeding, merely confers certain specified rights of action not upon the corporation itself, as such, but upon its treasurer in behalf of the corporation, and in no way curtails the powers of the corporation itself under the laws of this State.

    The objections raised are hereby dismissed.

    Objections dismissed.