DocketNumber: No. 31729
Citation Numbers: 91 N.E.2d 506, 153 Ohio St. 287, 153 Ohio St. (N.S.) 287
Judges: BY THE COURT.
Filed Date: 3/22/1950
Status: Precedential
Modified Date: 1/12/2023
From the facts alleged in the pleadings it is apparent that the instant proceeding is an attempt to convert a proceeding in prohibition into a second proceeding on appeal. A writ of prohibition not being available as a substitute for an appeal (32 Ohio Jurisprudence, 586, Section 24, citing, inter alia, State,ex rel. Burtzlaff, v. Vickery et al., Judges,
Writ denied.
WEYGANDT, C.J., MATTHIAS, HART, ZIMMERMAN, STEWART, TURNER and TAFT, JJ., concur.