Law v. Lake Metroparks

[Cite as Law v. Lake Metroparks, 116 Ohio St. 3d 322, 2007-Ohio-6749.]
LAW ET AL., APPELLANTS, v. LAKE METROPARKS, APPELLEE.
[Cite as Law v. Lake Metroparks, 116 Ohio St. 3d 322, 2007-Ohio-6749.]
Adverse possession — Real property owned by a park district — Court of
appeals’ judgment affirmed on the authority of Houck v. Bd. of Park
Commrs. of the Huron Cty. Park Dist.
(No. 2007-0298 — Submitted November 28, 2007 — Decided
December 20, 2007.)
APPEAL from the Court of Appeals for Lake County,
No. 2006-L-072, 2006-Ohio-7010.
__________________
{¶ 1} The judgment of the court of appeals is affirmed on the authority
of Houck v. Bd. of Park Commrs. of the Huron Cty. Park Dist., 116 Ohio St. 3d
148, 2007-Ohio-5586, 876 N.E.2d 1210.
MOYER, C.J., and LUNDBERG STRATTON, O’CONNOR, LANZINGER, and
CUPP, JJ., concur.
PFEIFER, J., dissents for the reasons stated in his dissenting opinion in
Houck v. Bd. of Park Commrs. of the Huron Cty. Park Dist.
O’DONNELL, J., not participating.
__________________
Redmond, Walker & Murray and Gerald R. Walker, for appellants.
Gibson, Brelo, Ziccarelli & Martello and Joseph Gibson, for appellee.
______________________