DocketNumber: No. 32717
Citation Numbers: 156 Ohio St. (N.S.) 179
Judges: Hart, Matthias, Middleton, Stewart, Taft, Weygandt, Zimmerman
Filed Date: 10/31/1951
Status: Precedential
Modified Date: 10/18/2022
The plaintiffs, not having availed themselves of the usual and adequate remedy of appeal, may not resort to the extraordinary remedy of prohibition as a substitute therefor. State, ex rel. Nicklaus, v. McClelland, Judge, 132 Ohio St., 447, 8 N. E. (2d), 565; Shafer v. Common Pleas Court of Franklin County, 137 Ohio St., 429, 30 N. E. (2d), 811; State,
The demurrers to the petition are sustained and a writ of prohibition is denied.
Writ demed.