DocketNumber: No. 29375
Citation Numbers: 49 N.E.2d 167, 141 Ohio St. 489, 141 Ohio St. (N.S.) 489
Judges: MATTHIAS, J.
Filed Date: 5/26/1943
Status: Precedential
Modified Date: 1/12/2023
While it is our opinion that the Probate Court properly entertained this proceeding for a declaratory judgment for the reasons stated by Judge Matthias in his opinion, we would not wish the impression to be gained that courts should assume jurisdiction generally of actions for declaratory judgments when there is pending at the time of the commencement of such an action, another action or proceeding to which the same persons are parties and in which are involved or may be adjudicated the *Page 501 identical questions that are presented in the declaratory action. Section 12102-6, General Code; 16 American Jurisprudence, 295, Section 22; 135 A. L. R., 934, annotation; 1 Corpus Juris Secundum, 1027, Section 18 (8).
BELL, J., concurs in the foregoing concurring opinion.
Indemnity Co. v. Plymouth , 146 Ohio St. 96 ( 1945 )
L. A. Ins. Co. v. Jones , 152 Ohio St. 287 ( 1949 )
Rehn v. INVCLE150, L.L.C. , 2022 Ohio 4634 ( 2022 )
State v. Braggs , 2013 Ohio 3364 ( 2013 )
Burlovic v. Farmer, Admr. , 96 Ohio App. 403 ( 1953 )
Estate of Severt v. Wood , 107 Ohio App. 3d 123 ( 1995 )
Sherrets v. Tuscarawas Sav. L. Co. , 78 Ohio App. 307 ( 1945 )
State v. Cincinnati Complaint Auth. , 2019 Ohio 5349 ( 2019 )