DocketNumber: No. L-07-1424.
Citation Numbers: 2008 Ohio 6537
Judges: SINGER, J.
Filed Date: 12/12/2008
Status: Non-Precedential
Modified Date: 7/6/2016
{¶ 2} Now divorced, on July 3, 2007, appellant, Herbert L. Snyder, Jr., and his wife, Deborah, were living separately. Their 13-year-old son, Ryan, was living with his mother in Oregon, Ohio. *Page 2
{¶ 3} Sometime prior to July 3, appellant and his wife purchased Ryan a paintball gun. Paintball guns shoot paint balls using a propellant cartridge containing compressed air or carbon dioxide.
{¶ 4} On the day at issue, Ryan spoke to appellant on the telephone, explaining that he was out of paintballs. Ryan and appellant agree that appellant offered to buy some paintballs and bring them to Ryan's house. They also agree that appellant warned Ryan not to "dry fire" the gun as this would unnecessarily deplete the propellant. There is conflict in the testimony as to whether appellant told Ryan that he intended to make Ryan's mother pay for the paintballs.
{¶ 5} Appellant arrived with a bag of paintballs which he gave to Ryan. Ryan loaded the gun and took some shots, aiming at a tree. According to Ryan, after a few shots, "* * * the gun sort of ran out of air and then the paintballs, they just fall [sic] right out of the barrel * * *." Ryan later testified that when this happened his father asked him, "* * * if I was firing the gun when he told me not to and I told him no. Then he started saying that I was a freak like my mother." Following this, according to Ryan, appellant grabbed Ryan's shirt collar, then started shaking him. "[T]hen he threw me. I thought he was trying to throw me to the ground." Ryan testified that appellant pushed him in the chest, causing him to lose his balance and stagger backward. Ryan testified that his father's actions caused redness on his neck that disappeared before police arrived. *Page 3
{¶ 6} Ryan and his mother called police who eventually charged appellant with domestic violence in violation of R.C. 2915.25(A). Appellant pled not guilty and the matter proceeded to a trial to the court.
{¶ 7} At trial, Ryan and his mother testified to the events of July 3. In his defense, appellant testified, denying that he told Ryan that he intended to make Ryan's mother pay for the paintballs. Moreover, appellant testified that when he chastised Ryan for disobeying his instruction not to dry fire the gun, Ryan responded "Fuck you." Appellant characterized grabbing Ryan's collar as an anger management technique he had learned. "I went to anger management, this is what they teach you, not to slap or punch, take something away from him * * * that he likes, you know?" According to appellant, he grabbed Ryan's collar so that he could take away the paintballs. Appellant denied shaking or pushing his son.
{¶ 8} Following trial, the court found appellant guilty as charged and sentenced him to 90 days jail time, with 60 days suspended. From this conviction, appellant now brings his appeal. Appellant sets forth the following two assignments of error:
{¶ 9} "[I.] The determination of guilt to the offense of domestic violence by the trial court was in error as the same was not established beyond a reasonable doubt.
{¶ 10} "[II.] The trial court erred to the prejudice of appellant in that the decision of the lower court determining that the appellant was guilty of the offense of domestic violence beyond a reasonable doubt took into account the exercise of appellant's right of *Page 4 confrontation as a basis for such determination contrary to the constitutions of the United States and the State of Ohio."
{¶ 12} A verdict or finding may be overturned on appeal if it is either against the manifest weight of the evidence or because there is an insufficiency of evidence. In the former, the appeals court acts as a "thirteenth juror" to determine whether the trier of fact lost its way and created such a manifest miscarriage of justice that the conviction must be overturned and a new trial ordered. State v. Thompkins (1997),
{¶ 13} R.C.
{¶ 14} Appellant argues that there was no corroboration of Ryan's testimony. Ryan's mother testified only that she was inside the house and heard what sounded like an altercation between father and son. Appellant admits to grabbing Ryan's collar, but insists the act was only part of permissible parental discipline.
{¶ 15} To be guilty of domestic violence under R.C.
{¶ 16} With respect to the weight of the evidence, at trial "* * * the weight to be given the evidence and the credibility of the witnesses are primarily for the trier of the facts." State v. DeHass (1967),
{¶ 18} "This Court makes a finding based upon the Defendant's own admission that he put his hands around his son's neck only for the sufficient time to retrieve the paint ball gun, that much he agrees with [what] this court feels rises to the level of domestic violence. Those facts coupled with the credibility of the alleged victim, Ryan Snyder, and his compelling testimony. Ryan was a polite, qui[et], young man who appeared well-dressed in court. He acted as if he did not want to testify against his father. In contrast, his father seemed to have no reservation about being involved in litigation with his son."
{¶ 19} In his second assignment of error, appellant focuses on the last two sentences of the court's findings, suggesting that the reason that Ryan Snyder testified was because of appellant's constitutional right to be confronted by his accuser. Appellant insists that the court's reliance on Ryan's apparent reluctance to testify is in derogation of his right to confrontation, because he should not be penalized for insisting on his constitutional rights.
{¶ 20} Our evaluation of the court's comments is not in conformity with the conclusion appellant puts forward. It is true that the Sixth Amendment, as well as Section
{¶ 21} On consideration whereof, the judgment of the Oregon Municipal Court is affirmed. Appellant is ordered to pay the costs of this appeal pursuant to App. R. 24. Judgment for the clerk's expense incurred in preparation of the record, fees allowed by law, and the fee for filing the appeal is awarded to Lucas County.
JUDGMENT AFFIRMED.
A certified copy of this entry shall constitute the mandate pursuant to App. R. 27. See, also, 6th Dist. Loc. App. R. 4. *Page 8
Mark L. Pietrykowski, P.J., Arlene Singer, J., Thomas J. Osowik, J., CONCUR. *Page 1