DocketNumber: No. 88635.
Citation Numbers: 2007 Ohio 4041
Judges: ANTHONY O. CALABRESE, JR., JUDGE.
Filed Date: 8/9/2007
Status: Precedential
Modified Date: 7/6/2016
{¶ 20} I respectfully dissent.
{¶ 21} The owner of premises must exercise reasonable or ordinary care for the invitee's safety and protection. Included in this duty is the duty to maintain the premises in a reasonably safe condition and to warn the invitee of latent or concealed defects of which the possessor has or should have knowledge. Scheibel v. Lipton (1951),
{¶ 22} In O'Brien v. Bob Evans Farms, Inc., Trumbull App. No. 2003-T-0106,
{¶ 23} Additionally, where the plaintiff, either personally or by outside witnesses, cannot identify what caused the fall, a finding of negligence on the part of the defendant is precluded. Stamper, supra;Mines v. Russo's Stop Shop (Feb. 23, 1989), Cuyahoga App. No. 55073; Smith v. Resch's Bakery (Dec. 10, 1987), Franklin App. No. 87AP-897.
{¶ 24} In Kubiszak v. Rini's Supermarket (1991),
*Page 10"1. That the nature, size, extent and location of such [hole] involved a potential hazard to customers, sufficient to justify a reasonable conclusion that the duty of ordinary care, which the operator of such [business] owes to his customers, would require such operator to prevent or remove such [hole] or to warn his customer about it, and
2. (a) That such sufficient potential hazard was created by some negligent act of the operator of the [business] or his employees, or
(b) That such operator or his employees had, or should in the exercise of ordinary care have had, notice of that potential hazard for a sufficient time to enable them in the exercise of ordinary care to remove it or to warn customers about it." Id., citing Anaple v. Standard Oil Co. (1955),
162 Ohio St. 537 ,124 N.E.2d 128 , paragraph one of the syllabus.
{¶ 25} The majority acknowledges that Lewin could not identify the exact location where she fell or the precise cause of her fall. She was unsure even which section of the pavement she fell on — asphalt, dirt, or gravel. She stated that she fell in a hole, but was unable to identify the hole in the photos. Thus, I would affirm the granting of summary judgment because a finding of negligence is precluded. *Page 1