DocketNumber: No. 12-07-12.
Citation Numbers: 2008 Ohio 1649
Judges: WILLAMOWSKI, J.
Filed Date: 4/7/2008
Status: Precedential
Modified Date: 7/6/2016
{¶ 1} The defendant-appellant, Leroy Lugo, appeals the judgment of the Putnam County Common Pleas Court sentencing him to six years in prison. On appeal, Lugo contends the trial court erred when it imposed more than the minimum sentence for a first-degree felony because the court did not make any of the findings required by R.C.
{¶ 2} On March 28, 2007, the Putnam County Grand Jury indicted Lugo on the following offenses: one count of aggravated burglary, a violation of R.C.
{¶ 3} On August 9, 2007, the trial court held a sentencing hearing. Defense counsel made statements in mitigation, making particular reference to Lugo's military service during Operation Desert Storm and his subsequent employment as a licensed practical nurse. Counsel also represented to the court that Lugo suffers from post-traumatic stress disorder, "which he suffered in the service of his country * * *." Counsel indicated that at the time of the offense, Lugo was unaware that he suffered from post-traumatic stress disorder and was unable to cope with the fact that his wife had left him for another man. Lugo was also given the opportunity to speak in mitigation. The trial court believed that Lugo's apology was "heartfelt" and that he greatly regretted the offense. However, the court determined that Lugo's behavior had been significant and ordered him to serve a prison term of six years. Lugo appeals the judgment of the trial court, raising one assignment of error for our review.
In sentencing Mr. Lugo to more than the minimum sentence, the court below violated R.C. §2929.14 because it failed to make the statutory findings required by subsection (B) to support more than the minimum sentence.
{¶ 4} In support of his assignment of error, Lugo contends that the determinate sentences authorized by the General Assembly for a first-degree felony are either three, four, five, six, seven, eight, nine, or ten years in prison. Lugo claims the trial court was required to impose a three-year sentence unless it *Page 4
made certain findings pursuant to R.C.
{¶ 5} R.C.
Except as provided in division (C), (D)(1), (D)(2), (D)(3), (D)(5), (D)(6), (G), or (L) of this section, in section
2907.02 or2907.05 of the Revised Code, or in Chapter 2925. of the Revised Code, if the court imposing a sentence upon an offender for a felony elects or is required to impose a prison term on the offender, the court shall impose the shortest prison term authorized for the offense pursuant to division (A) of this section, unless one or more of the following applies:(1) The offender was serving a prison term at the time of the offense, or the offender previously had served a prison term.
(2) The court finds on the record that the shortest prison term will demean the seriousness of the offender's conduct or will not adequately protect the public from future crime by the offender or others.
Senate Bill 2, which became effective in 1996, added R.C.
{¶ 6} The court elected to remedy the constitutional defect by severing the offending provisions from the statute pursuant toUnited States v. Booker (2005),
{¶ 7} Lugo's appeal also addresses what he perceives to be the trial court's disregard of mitigating factors. While trial courts are no longer required to make statutory findings before imposing sentence, they are also not required to give their reasons for sentencing. Id., at ¶ 100. However, the transcript of the sentencing hearing clearly reflects that the court did consider the mitigating factors presented by Lugo and his attorney. The judge stated that he had intended to sentence Lugo to ten years in prison, but having considered the victim impact statements and the mitigating statements made by Lugo and his attorney, he was willing to impose a six-year sentence instead. (Sentencing Tran., Oct. 25, 2007, at 18). The sole assignment of error is overruled.
{¶ 8} The judgment of the Putnam County Common Pleas Court is affirmed.
Judgment affirmed.
*Page 1PRESTON and ROGERS, JJ., concur.