DocketNumber: Case No. 02-JE-39.
Judges: <bold>PER CURIAM</bold>.
Filed Date: 4/21/2003
Status: Non-Precedential
Modified Date: 7/6/2016
{¶ 2} The Ohio Public Defender was subsequently appointed as counsel for appellant and on March 6, 2003 filed a brief listing the following assignments of error:
{¶ 3} 1. "The trial court erred when it ordered Mr. McGee to pay court-appointed counsel fees without making the necessary ability-to-pay finding required by R.C.
{¶ 4} 2. "The trial court erred when it ordered Mr. McGee to pay `all fees permitted pursuant to ORC
{¶ 5} On March 27, 2003, the appellee filed a stipulation that the two assigned errors have merit and motioned that the matter be remanded for a determination of ability to pay before assessment of any costs or fees.
{¶ 6} As the assigned errors contain common questions of law and fact they will be discussed together.
{¶ 7} Under R.C.
{¶ 8} "The fees and expenses approved by the court under this section shall not be taxed as part of the costs and shall be paid by the county. However, if the person represented has, or reasonably may be expected to have, the means to meet some part of the cost of the services rendered to the person, the person shall pay the county an amount that the person reasonably can be expected to pay." There is a clear requirement that the trial court make an affirmative determination on the record that a defendant has, or reasonably may be expected to have, the means to pay some or all of the cost of legal services he receives. Statev. Cooper (2002),
{¶ 9} In addition, under R.C.
{¶ 10} "Before imposing a financial sanction under section
{¶ 11} We agree with appellant that the record before this Court contains no evidence that appellant has the present ability, or will reasonably be expected to have, the financial means to pay assigned counsel costs and other fees under R.C.
{¶ 12} Accordingly, that part of the sentencing entry filed May 10, 2002, requiring appellant to pay costs and fees, is vacated and this cause is remanded for a determination of the appellant's ability to pay, or reasonable expectation of an ability to pay, the fees and costs assessed. The remainder of the judgment is affirmed.
{¶ 13} Costs of this proceeding taxed against appellee.
Donofrio, J., Vukovich, J., and Waite, J., concur.