DocketNumber: No. 2007-A-0056.
Judges: PER CURIAM.
Filed Date: 11/9/2007
Status: Precedential
Modified Date: 7/6/2016
{¶ 2} The present incarceration of petitioner, Alan J. Christian, is based upon a 2002 conviction in the Mahoning County Court of Common Pleas. Following a jury trial, petitioner was found guilty of one count of felonious assault and an accompanying firearm specification. The trial court then ordered him to serve consecutive terms of five years on the main offense and three years on the specification, for an aggregate sentence of eight years. As the primary basis for his instant claim in habeas corpus, petitioner alleges that the Mahoning County trial court lacked the basic jurisdiction to sentence him because the original complaint against him was not properly sworn by the police officer whose signature appeared on the document.
{¶ 3} In regard to petitioner's request for a change of venue, this court would note that our authority to grant a writ of habeas corpus is governed by R.C.
{¶ 4} "If a person restrained of his liberty is an inmate of a state benevolent or correctional institution, the location of which is fixed by statute and at the time is in the custody of the officers of the institution, no court or judge other than the courts or judges of the county in which the institution is located has jurisdiction to issue or determine a writ of habeas corpus for his production or discharge. Any writ issued by a court or judge of another county to an officer or person in charge at the state institution to compel the production or discharge of an inmate thereof is void."
{¶ 5} Pursuant to the foregoing, a habeas corpus action can only be maintained in the county where the inmate is incarcerated. In applying this statute, this court has concluded that its basic requirements are jurisdictional in nature. See Dewey v. State, *Page 3
11th Dist. No. 2006-A-0012,
{¶ 6} In considering instances in which the inmate has failed to file his petition for the writ in the appropriate county, some appellate courts of this state have held that the proper remedy is a change of venue to the county where the inmate is incarcerated. See, e.g.,State ex rel. Vereen v. State (1989),
{¶ 7} While this court would indicate that we do not agree that a change of venue should be granted in all instances in which R.C.
{¶ 8} Consistent with the foregoing legal analysis, it is the order of this court that petitioner's motion for a change of venue is granted. It is further ordered that the instant action in habeas corpus is hereby transferred to the Court of Appeals for Allen County. The Ashtabula County Clerk of Courts is instructed to deliver all original papers filed in *Page 4 this action to the clerk for the Court of Appeals for Allen County.
DIANE V. GRENDELL, J., COLLEEN MARY O'TOOLE, J., MARY JANE TRAPP, J., concur. *Page 1