DocketNumber: No. 14372.
Citation Numbers: 588 N.E.2d 169, 67 Ohio App. 3d 661
Judges: REECE, Presiding Judge.
Filed Date: 5/16/1990
Status: Precedential
Modified Date: 1/13/2023
In 1976, plaintiff-appellant, Dale Young, was ordered to appear before the domestic relations court in response to a contempt charge. Young was found to be in contempt and a warrant for her arrest was issued. Young appealed to this court, which found that the contempt order was not valid. Young v. Young (Nov. 17, 1976), Summit App. No. 8084, unreported.
On January 2, 1981, the trial court released and discharged the contempt. This order was filed with the clerk of courts, thus vacating the capias issued in 1976. However, the Summit County Sheriff's Department never received any notice that the capias had been vacated.
On December 28, 1987, Young was arrested pursuant to this warrant. Young filed a wrongful arrest complaint against defendants-appellees, Summit County and Sheriff David Troutman. The trial court granted summary judgment in favor of the appellees. Young appeals.
Young contends that summary judgment was not proper in that there are genuine issues of material fact as to why the sheriff's department served an invalid warrant ten years after it was issued.
Summary judgment shall not be rendered unless there is no genuine issue as to any material fact, and reasonable minds can come to but one conclusion, which is adverse to the nonmoving party. Toledo's Great Eastern Shoppers *Page 663 City, Inc. v. Abde's Black Angus Steak House No. III, Inc.
(1986),
Although the trial court's order granting summary judgment in favor of the appellees does not state upon what basis it was granted, appellees contend that they are immune from liability pursuant to R.C.
The Political Subdivision Tort Liability Act (the "Act"), which applies to causes of action against political subdivisions for injuries to persons that arise on or after November 20, 1985, provides in part:
"`Political subdivision' or `subdivision' means a municipal corporation, township, county, school district, or other body corporate and politic responsible for governmental activities in a geographic area smaller than that of the state. * * *" R.C.
The Act includes as a "governmental function" an act that is an obligation of the subdivision, whether entered into voluntarily or by statute. R.C.
The Act also enumerates defenses that can be asserted to avoid liability:
"The political subdivision is immune from liability if the conduct of the employee involved, other than negligent conduct, that gave rise to the claim of liability was required by law or authorized by law, or if the conduct of the employee involved that gave rise to the claim of liability was necessary or essential to the exercise of powers of the political subdivision or employee." R.C.
Therefore, a subdivision can assert as a defense that the activity engaged in was required or authorized by law. An arrest made pursuant to an arrest warrant is an activity authorized by law.
"Employee" as used in the Act includes any elected or appointed official of a political subdivision. R.C.
There is no evidence in the record that Troutman performed any acts or omissions. However, R.C.
"The sheriff shall only be responsible for the neglect of duty or misconduct in office of any of his deputies if he orders, has prior knowledge of, participates in, acts in reckless disregard of, or ratifies the neglect of duty or misconduct in office of the deputy."
Young does not allege in her complaint a cause of action under the doctrine of respondeat superior, as enunciated in R.C.
Based on the foregoing reasons, the trial court did not err in granting summary judgment for the appellees. Young's assignment of error is not well taken and the judgment of the trial court is affirmed.
Judgment affirmed.
BAIRD and CIRIGLIANO, JJ., concur.