DocketNumber: C.A. No. 21233.
Judges: BATCHELDER, Judge.
Filed Date: 4/30/2003
Status: Non-Precedential
Modified Date: 4/18/2021
{¶ 51} I respectfully disagree with the majority's conclusion that the trial court made the requisite findings on the record when it sentenced Appellant to the consecutive terms of imprisonment. Such findings must be made on the record at the sentencing hearing. See Statev. Riggs (Oct. 11, 2000), 9th Dist. No. 19846, at 7 (Whitmore, J., concurring in part and dissenting in part). Moreover, in Woods v. Telb
(2000),
{¶ 52} Accordingly, I would sustain Appellant's assignment of sixth assignment of error in part and remand this case to the trial court with an order to set forth the necessary findings at the sentencing hearing when imposing the consecutive terms of imprisonment. I concur with the majority's disposition of the remaining assignments of error.