DocketNumber: No. CA2005-08-016.
Judges: BRESSLER, J.
Filed Date: 3/20/2006
Status: Non-Precedential
Modified Date: 4/18/2021
{¶ 2} In early 2000, Airline Professionals acquired title to a tract of land in Union Township by general warranty deed. The named grantee in the deed was listed as "Airline Professional [sic] Association Teamsters Local 1224." On August 24, 2001, Airline Professionals recorded a notice of commencement with the Clinton County Recorder to publicize its impending construction of an office building on the premises. The notice was filed under the name "APA Teamsters Local 1224." Construction began in early 2002. Airline Professionals hired Magnetic North Electrical Contractor, Inc. (Magnetic North) to provide certain subcontractor services. Clinton Electrical, a supplier of goods and materials to Magnetic North for use in the project, filed an affidavit for a mechanics' lien with the Clinton County Recorder's Office on January 7, 2002. Clinton Electrical never recorded a notice of furnishing for materials provided.
{¶ 3} On March 27, 2002, Clinton Electrical filed suit to foreclose on its lien after Airline Professionals served a notice to commence suit on the lien.1 Clinton Electrical sought to recover $32,105.88 for materials supplied to Magnetic North. Airline Professionals filed a motion to dismiss the complaint which the trial court denied on June 17, 2002. Airline Professionals also filed a motion for summary judgment which the court denied on June 15, 2004. Clinton Electrical subsequently filed its summary judgment motion, which the trial court granted on August 18, 2004. The court determined that lien amount was to be satisfied out of a cash bond posted by Airline Professionals. Airline Professionals timely appealed the trial court's award of summary judgment to Clinton Electrical.
{¶ 4} We review a trial court's decision on a summary judgment motion de novo. Burgess v. Tackas (1998),
{¶ 5} In a single assignment of error, Airline Professionals contends that the trial court erred in granting summary judgment to Clinton Electrical. Airline Professionals insists that it properly filed a notice of commencement in substantial compliance with R.C.
{¶ 6} R.C.
{¶ 7} The language of R.C.
{¶ 8} After reviewing the record, it is apparent that Airline Professionals failed to substantially comply with R.C.
{¶ 9} Contrary to Airline Professionals' assertions, this is not a case where a lien claimant seeks to evade its duty to timely file a notice of furnishing by attacking a notice of commencement on palpably weak grounds. In Jim Morgan Elec. Co.v. Smith (C.P. 1996),
{¶ 10} Airline Professionals implies that Clinton Electrical failed to safeguard its lien rights by omitting evidence that it made an affirmative attempt to search for a notice of commencement. To the contrary, Clinton Electrical presented an index page from the Clinton County Recorder demonstrating that a search of the index conducted under "Airline Professionals" did not reveal the defective notice of commencement. We decline to accept Airline Professionals' argument that "APA" was a designation substantially compliant with statutory requirements and that Clinton Electrical should have broadened its search to include this acronym. A lien claimant cannot be expected to search for all combinations and permutations of letters in order to cover every possible name under which a notice of commencement may be filed. Cf. RN Building Materials. As stated by the trial court in its entry denying Airline Professionals' motion to dismiss, "it is not asking too much of real property owners to simply use the name in which the owner took title to real property on the Notice of Commencement if the owner wants to avail itself of the statutory protections provided in R.C. 1311.04."
{¶ 11} Airline Professionals implores the court to hold that a materialman or subcontractor who fails to file a notice of furnishing based on a deficient notice of commencement must affirmatively demonstrate that it suffered prejudice as a result of the alleged defect. We disagree. The Ohio lien laws are remedial in nature, designed in part to protect those who contribute to real property improvement by affording them the right to obtain compensation out of the land and its occupying structure. 68 Ohio Jurisprudence 3d (1999) 22-23, Mechanics' Liens, Section 4. To require those seeking redress pursuant to a valid lien to demonstrate prejudice as the result of a defective notice of commencement places a burden on lien holders which is unsupported by the plain language of the mechanics' lien statutes. Cf. Roxane Laboratories, Inc. v. Tracy,
{¶ 12} Based on the foregoing analysis, we conclude that Airline Professionals failed to satisfy its reciprocal evidentiary burden after Clinton Electrical demonstrated that there were no genuine issues for trial. Accordingly, the trial court properly granted summary judgment in favor of Clinton Electrical. Airline Professionals' sole assignment of error is overruled.
{¶ 13} Judgment affirmed.
Powell, P.J., and Walsh, J., concur.