DocketNumber: No. 22444.
Citation Numbers: 2008 Ohio 3483
Judges: GRADY, J.
Filed Date: 7/11/2008
Status: Precedential
Modified Date: 7/6/2016
ASSIGNMENT OF ERROR
{¶ 2} "THE COURT ERRED BY FAILING TO REVIEW NECESSARY FACTS TO SUPPORT THE ESSENTIAL ELEMENTS OF THE CRIMES CHARGED DURING A NO CONTEST PLEA AND THEREBY VIOLATED DEFENDANT'S CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHT TO DUE PROCESS UNDER THE
{¶ 3} The trial court accepted Defendant's plea of no contest following his Crim. R. 11(C)(2) plea colloquy with the court. The court then made the following pronouncement:
{¶ 4} "I'll accept your plea of no contest and order this waiver document filed. The Court is going to accept as conclusively proven the elements of each of the charges as outlined in the indictment here. And based on that, then the Court's going to make a finding that — of guilty by proof beyond a reasonable doubt as to each charge. And we'll enter that finding on the record." (T. 8).
{¶ 5} Defendant argues that the trial court erred when it found him guilty on his no contest plea, absent an explanation of the circumstances constituting his two offenses, because *Page 3
without that explanation the court lacked a factual record sufficient to support the court's guilty verdicts. Defendant relies on R.C.
{¶ 6} R.C.
{¶ 7} "A plea to a misdemeanor offense of `no contest' or words of similar import shall constitute a stipulation that the judge or magistrate may make a finding of guilty or not guilty from the explanation of the circumstances of the offense. If a finding of guilty is made, the judge or magistrate shall impose the sentence or continue the case for sentencing accordingly. A plea of `no contest' or words of *Page 4 similar import shall not be construed as an admission of any fact at issue in the criminal charge in any subsequent civil or criminal action or proceeding." (Emphasis supplied).
{¶ 8} Notwithstanding the accused's no contest plea and the sufficiency of the facts alleged in the complaint in charging a misdemeanor offense, because R.C.
{¶ 9} By its terms, R.C.
{¶ 10} Pleas of guilty or no contest to charges alleging felony offenses are instead governed by Crim. R. 11(B)(2), which provides:
{¶ 11} "The plea of no contest is not an admission of defendant's guilt, but is an admission of the truth of the *Page 5 facts alleged in the indictment, information, or complaint, and the plea or admission shall not be used against the defendant in any subsequent civil or criminal proceeding."
{¶ 12} Where the indictment contains allegations sufficient to allege a felony offense and the defendant pleads no contest, the court does not err when it finds the defendant guilty of committing the crime charged.State v. Bird,
{¶ 13} The assignment of error is overruled. The judgment of the trial court will be affirmed.
*Page 1WOLFF, P.J. And FAIN, J., concur.