DocketNumber: Case No. CA2001-12-093 (Accelerated Calendar).
Filed Date: 6/17/2002
Status: Non-Precedential
Modified Date: 4/18/2021
Plaintiffs-appellants, James E. and Janice M. Cahill and Daniel S. and Angie R. Martin, each contracted with Woodland Enterprises, Ltd. ("Woodland"), an Ohio limited liability corporation, for the construction of a Wasau home. Appellants entered into construction loan agreements with New Richmond National Bank to finance the construction. Woodland experienced financial difficulties and eventually filed for Chapter 7 bankruptcy before construction of the homes was completed.
Appellants filed suit against appellees, Woodland, New Richmond National Bank and Michael Scheu, alleging fraud, breach of contract, civil conspiracy, and violations of the Consumer Sales Practices Act. Pursuant to an arbitration clause contained in the construction contract, the trial court referred the matter to arbitration and stayed the proceeding. From this decision, appellants appeal, raising two assignments of error.
Assignment of Error No. 1:
"The trial court erred and abused its discretion by not utilizing the procedure enumerated in ORC §
2711.02 and failed to examine the entirety of the written agreements prior to its referral of the case to arbitration."
The first assignment of error is overruled as the trial court's decision staying the proceeding pending arbitration does not constitute an abuse of discretion. See McGuffey v. LensCrafters, Inc. (2001),
Assignment of Error No. 2:
"The trial court erred and abused its discretion by failing to take into consideration the actual parties bound by the terms of the construction contracts between the plaintiffs and Woodland Enterprises, Ltd."
The second assignment of error is sustained, as appellants cannot be compelled to arbitrate their claims against Sheu personally. Because arbitration is a matter of contract, a party that has not agreed to arbitration cannot be compelled to arbitrate. Glenmoore Builders, Inc.v. Kennedy, Portage App. No. 2001-P-0007, 2001-Ohio-8777, citing OwensFlooring Co. v. Hummel Constr. Co. (2000),
Judgment affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Pursuant to App.R. 11.1(E), this entry shall not be relied upon as authority and will not be published in any form. A certified copy of this judgment entry shall constitute the mandate pursuant to App.R. 27.
Costs to be taxed one-third against defendant-appellee, Michael Scheu, and two-thirds against plaintiffs-appellants, James E. and Janice M. Cahill and Daniel S. and Angie R. Martin.
James E. Walsh, Presiding Judge, William W. Young, Judge, and Anthony Valen, Judge, concur.