DocketNumber: C.A. No. 21211.
Citation Numbers: 2006 Ohio 1590
Judges: WOLFF, J.
Filed Date: 3/31/2006
Status: Non-Precedential
Modified Date: 7/6/2016
{¶ 2} A notice of appeal was filed on Fore's behalf and counsel was appointed to prosecute an appeal. On December 19, 2005, appointed appellate counsel filed an Anders brief pursuant to Anders v. California (1967),
{¶ 3} On December 22, 2005, we informed Fore by decision and entry that his appellate counsel had filed an Anders brief and of the significance of an Anders brief. We invited Fore to file pro se assignments of error with this court within sixty days of December 22, 2005. Fore has filed nothing with this court. Pursuant to our responsibilities under Anders, we have conducted a thorough review of the record in this case, and we conclude as did appointed appellate counsel that there are no potentially meritorious issues to advance on appeal, and that this appeal is wholly frivolous.
{¶ 4} Significantly, sentencing in this case does not implicate any of the statutes found to be unconstitutional inState v. Foster ___ Ohio St.3d ___,
{¶ 5} Accordingly, the judgment will be affirmed.
Grady, P.J. and Donovan, J., concur.