DocketNumber: No. 461
Citation Numbers: 348 N.E.2d 371, 46 Ohio App. 2d 184
Judges: POTTER, P. J.
Filed Date: 1/31/1975
Status: Precedential
Modified Date: 1/13/2023
Two separate informations were filed in the Court of Common Pleas of Ottawa County, charging defendant with robbery, a violation of R. C.
"Assignment of Error No. 1:
"The trial Court's refusal to probate appellant for treatment pursuant to Section
"Assignment of Error No. 2:
"The trial Court's Judgment of July 12, 1974 denying probation to appellant for treatment pursuant to Section
Pertinent to ruling on the above assignments of error is an examination of the following paragraphs of R. C.
"(A) If the court has reason to believe that a person convicted of any felony or misdemeanor for which probation may be granted is a drug dependent person or in danger of becoming a drug dependent person, it may order him to submit to a medical and psychiatric examination to determine if he is dependent on drugs or in danger of becoming a drug dependent person, and if he may be rehabilitated through treatment. Such examination shall be conducted by or under the supervision of a competent physician appointed by the court, and may be carried out in any appropriate institution under the control of the department of mental health and mental retardation and at correctional institutions under the department of correction, or in any public hospital, clinic, or other proper institution.
"(B) Within thirty days from the date an examination is ordered under this section, the physician conducting such examination shall submit to the court, in writing, a report of his findings and opinion on whether the defendant *Page 186 is a drug dependent person or in danger of becoming such, and whether he may be rehabilitated through treatment. The court shall transmit a copy of the report to the defendant or his attorney.
"(C) Following examination, the court shall hold a hearing to determine if the defendant is a drug dependent person or in danger of becoming a drug dependent person, and if he may be rehabilitated through treatment. The defendant shall be afforded an opportunity to present evidence controverting the report of examination or any of its findings or opinions.
"(D) If, upon hearing, the court finds that the defendant is a drug dependent person or in danger of becoming such, and may be rehabilitated through treatment, it may suspend execution of the sentence imposed and place him on probation in the custody of the department of correction, on condition that he submit to and faithfully follow the treatment prescribed for his drug dependence or danger of drug dependence, and on such other conditions as the court considers necessary to insure his good behavior."
This court has been directed to two cases which have wrestled with the interpretation of R. C.
It is apparent that neither case considered R. C.
"(A) At the time of sentencing or at any time before an offender is delivered into the custody of the institution in which he is to serve his sentence, when an indefinite term of imprisonment for felony is imposed, the court may suspend the sentence and place the offender on probation pursuant to section
"(B) After an offender is delivered into the custody of the institution in which he is to serve his sentence, when an indefinite term of imprisonment for felony is imposed, and during the period prescribed by section
It has long been established that trial courts have only that power to suspend execution of sentence as is authorized by statute. See, Municipal Court of Toledo v. State, ex rel.Platter (1933),
We, therefore, conclude that while the trial court could have suspended the execution of sentence imposed, such authority under the language of R. C.
The trial court could have acted under R. C.
For the foregoing reasons, the assignments of error are found not well taken and the judgment of the Court of Common Pleas is affirmed.
Judgment affirmed.
BROWN and WILEY, JJ., concur. *Page 189