State v. Wofford

[Cite as State v. Wofford, 2019-Ohio-2815.]
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS
FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT OF OHIO
HAMILTON COUNTY, OHIO
STATE OF OHIO, : APPEAL NO. C-180411
TRIAL NO. B-1602231
Plaintiff-Appellee,
: O P I N I O N.
vs.
:
JAMES WOFFORD,
:
Defendant-Appellant.
Criminal Appeal From: Hamilton County Court of Common Pleas
Judgment Appealed From Is: Affirmed
Date of Judgment Entry on Appeal: July 10, 2019
Joseph T. Deters, Hamilton County Prosecuting Attorney, and Scott M. Heenan,
Assistant Prosecuting Attorney, for Plaintiff-Appellee,
William F. Oswall Jr., for Defendant-Appellant.
OHIO FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS
CROUSE, Judge.
{¶1} Defendant-appellant James Wofford appeals the decision of the trial
court sentencing him to prison on his conviction for involuntary manslaughter. In
one assignment of error, Wofford argues that the trial court improperly declined to
consider community control in sentencing him to prison, and so he must be
resentenced. We overrule Wofford’s assignment of error and affirm the decision of
the trial court.
{¶2} Wofford pled guilty to one count of involuntary manslaughter under
R.C. 2903.04(A), a felony of the first degree, and an accompanying firearm
specification under R.C. 2941.145. He was sentenced to 11 years in prison for the
involuntary-manslaughter charge and three years for the firearm specification, to be
served consecutively.
{¶3} R.C. 2929.14(B)(1)(a)(ii) mandates that a prison term of three years be
imposed for offenses in which the offender had a firearm on his person or under his
control while committing the offense and displayed, brandished, or indicated that he
possessed the firearm, or used it to facilitate the offense. The trial court was required
to impose a separate three-year prison term for the firearm specification.
{¶4} Wofford does not take issue with the mandatory three-year firearm-
specification sentence, but argues that he was eligible for community control on the
involuntary-manslaughter conviction, and that the trial judge erred by failing to
consider community control as a possible sentence for that offense.
2
OHIO FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS
R.C. 2929.13(F)(8)
{¶5} Because the trial court was required to impose a prison sentence for
the involuntary-manslaughter conviction, Wofford’s assignment of error has no
merit.
{¶6} Generally, a prison term is presumed for a first- or second- degree
felony, but the trial court can impose community control if it makes certain findings.
R.C. 2929.13(D). Nevertheless, R.C. 2929.13(F) requires a trial court to impose a
prison sentence under certain circumstances. State v. Johnson, 116 Ohio St. 3d 541,
2008-Ohio-69, 880 N.E.2d 896, ¶ 9; See R.C. 2929.01(X)(1) (defining a mandatory
prison term as including one that must be imposed under R.C. 2929.13(F)(1) to (8)
or (12) to (22)).
{¶7} Similarly, this court has held that R.C. 2929.13(F)(6) requires that a
prison sentence be imposed for any first- or second- degree felony when the
defendant has a prior first- or second- degree felony conviction. State v. Kinney,
2018-Ohio-404, 105 N.E.3d 603, ¶ 23 (1st Dist.).
{¶8} R.C. 2929.13(F)(8) requires the court to impose a prison term for any
felony offense, except a violation of R.C. 2923.12 (carrying a concealed weapon),
during which the offender had a firearm on or about his person or under his control
while committing the felony, with respect to a portion of the sentence imposed
pursuant to R.C. 2929.14(B)(1)(a).
{¶9} Involuntary manslaughter under R.C. 2903.04(A) is a felony of the
first degree subject to a maximum sentence of 11 years. R.C. 2929.14(A)(1). As noted
above, the firearm specification in R.C. 2929.14(B)(1)(a)(ii) requires that the
offender had a firearm on his person or under his control while committing the
3
OHIO FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS
offense and displayed, brandished, or indicated that he possessed the firearm, or
used it to facilitate the offense.
{¶10} Wofford pled guilty to involuntary manslaughter and the
accompanying firearm specification, and so he admitted to committing a felony while
having a firearm on his person or under his control. Therefore, pursuant to R.C.
2929.13(F)(8), the trial court was required to impose a prison sentence for the
involuntary-manslaughter offense. Because Wofford was not eligible for community
control, his sole assignment of error is overruled, and the judgment of the trial court
is affirmed.
Judgment affirmed.
MYERS, P.J., and BERGERON, J., concur.
Please note:
The court has recorded its own entry on the date of the release of this opinion.
4