State v. Aziz-Hakim

[Cite as State v. Aziz-Hakim, 2014-Ohio-3006.]
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS
ELEVENTH APPELLATE DISTRICT
PORTAGE COUNTY, OHIO
STATE OF OHIO, : MEMORANDUM OPINION
Plaintiff-Appellee, :
CASE NO. 2014-P-0011
- vs - :
ALI A. AZIZ-HAKIM, :
Defendant-Appellant. :
Criminal Appeal from the Portage County Municipal Court, Ravenna Division, Case No.
2010 TRD 5187.
Judgment: Appeal dismissed.
Victor V. Vigluicci, Portage County Prosecutor, and Pamela J. Holder, Assistant
Prosecutor, 241 South Chestnut Street, Ravenna, OH 44266 (For Plaintiff-Appellee).
Ali A. Aziz-Hakim, pro se, P.O. Box 5600, Cleveland, OH 44101 (Defendant-
Appellant).
COLLEEN MARY O’TOOLE, J.
{¶1} Appellant, Ali A. Aziz-Hakim, pro se, filed a notice of appeal on April 10,
2014, from a judgment entry issued by the Portage County Municipal Court, Ravenna
Division, on April 3, 2014, which denied appellant’s motion to dismiss.
{¶2} Appellee, the state of Ohio, filed a motion to dismiss the appeal for lack of
a final appealable order on April 15, 2014. No brief or response in opposition to the
motion has been filed.
{¶1} Pursuant to R.C. 2953.02, a court of appeals only possesses jurisdiction
to hear an appeal from a criminal case if the appeal is from a “judgment or final order.”
{¶2} In addition, R.C. 2505.02(B) defines a final appealable order, in part, as
the following:
{¶3} “An order is a final order that may be reviewed, affirmed, modified, or
reversed, with or without retrial, when it is one of the following:
{¶4} “(1) An order that affects a substantial right in an action that in effect
determines the action and prevents a judgment;
{¶5} “(2) An order that affects a substantial right made in a special proceeding
or upon a summary application in an action after judgment;
{¶6} “(3) An order that vacates or sets aside a judgment or grants a new trial;
{¶7} “(4) An order that grants or denies a provisional remedy and to which both
of the following apply:
{¶8} “(a) The order in effect determines the action with respect to the
provisional remedy and prevents a judgment in the action in favor of the appealing party
with respect to the provisional remedy.
{¶9} “(b) The appealing party would not be afforded a meaningful or effective
remedy by an appeal following final judgment as to all proceedings, issues, claims, and
parties in the action. ***”
{¶10} Furthermore, the Supreme Court of Ohio has stated that “in a criminal
case there must be a sentence which constitutes a judgment or a final order which
amounts ‘to a disposition of the cause’ before there is a basis for appeal.” State v.
Chamberlain (1964), 177 Ohio St. 104, 106-107.
2
{¶11} In the instant matter, the trial court has merely denied appellant’s motion
to dismiss his case. Since the case has not gone forward on the charges against
appellant for speeding, no driver’s license and having fictitious license plates, there is
presently no judgment which could be the subject of an appeal. Therefore, there is no
final appealable order, and this court lacks jurisdiction.
{¶12} Accordingly, appellee’s motion to dismiss is granted, and this appeal is
hereby dismissed for lack of a final appealable order.
TIMOTHY P. CANNON, P.J.,
DIANE V. GRENDELL, J.,
concur.
3