State v. Breneman

[Cite as State v. Breneman, 2014-Ohio-1102.]
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR CHAMPAIGN COUNTY, OHIO
STATE OF OHIO :
Plaintiff-Appellee : C.A. CASE NO. 2013 CA 15
v. : T.C. NO. 10CR22
JAMES D. BRENEMAN : (Criminal appeal from
Common Pleas Court)
Defendant-Appellant :
:
..........
OPINION
Rendered on the 21st day of March , 2014.
..........
JENNIFER E. GELLER, Atty. Reg. No. 0088855, Assistant Prosecuting Attorney, 200 N.
Main Street, Urbana, Ohio 43078
Attorney for Plaintiff-Appellee
BARBARA A. LAHMANN, Atty. Reg. No. 0039156, 65 Tahlequah Trail, Springboro, Ohio
45066
Attorney for Defendant-Appellant
..........
FROELICH, J.
{¶ 1} In January 2013, James D. Breneman was found guilty by a jury in the
2
Champaign County Court of Common Pleas of one count of possession of cocaine, a felony
of the third degree. 1 The trial court sentenced him to 18 months in prison and to a
three-year term of post-release control. The court also ordered Breneman, who was
represented by appointed counsel at trial, “to pay back the legal fees” incurred in his defense
as costs. Breneman appeals, challenging the court’s imposition of costs associated with his
legal fees.
{¶ 2} For the following reasons, the judgment of the trial court will be affirmed in
part and vacated in part.
{¶ 3} Breneman objects to the portion of his sentence in which the trial court
ordered that he “pay back the legal fees” as costs of the case. At the sentencing hearing, the
State requested “the costs of the case to be paid appropriately,” and the court stated that
Breneman would be ordered to pay “costs.” The requirement that Breneman pay “legal
fees” was stated only in the judgment entry.
{¶ 4} We have held that, if a trial court is to impose costs on a defendant as part
of his sentence, it must pronounce those costs in open court at the sentencing hearing,
because failure to do so violates a defendant’s due process and Crim.R. 43 rights to be
present at sentencing. State v. Miller, 2d Dist. Clark No. 08CA0090, 2010-Ohio-4760, ¶
56; State v. Simms, 10th Dist. Franklin No. 13AP-299, 2013-Ohio-5142, ¶ 8. By ordering
the payment of legal fees only in the judgment entry, the trial court erred in failing to impose
1
In a previous trial, Breneman had been found guilty of possession of cocaine and not guilty of trafficking in cocaine
and possession of criminal tools. On appeal, we reversed his conviction for possession, finding that the trial court had abused its
discretion when it refused to grant Breneman’s motion for substitution of counsel. State v. Breneman, 2d Dist. Champaign No.
2010 CA 18, 2012-Ohio-2534. When Breneman was retried, he was again convicted of possession of cocaine.
3
its entire sentence in Breneman’s presence.
{¶ 5} Furthermore, we have held that R.C. 2941.51(D), upon which the State
relies in its brief, does not permit the recoupment of legal costs in the manner employed by
the trial court. R.C. 2941.51(D) does allow a county to seek reimbursement of
court-appointed counsel fees if a defendant has the means to pay for some or all of the costs
of services provided to him, but we have held that the right of action it confers “must be
prosecuted in a civil action.” Miller at ¶ 61, citing State v. Crenshaw, 145 Ohio App.3d 86,
761 N.E.2d 1121 (8th Dist.2001); State v. Hill, 2d Dist. Clark No. 04CA0047,
2005-Ohio-3877, ¶ 6. The statute specifically states that “fees and expenses approved by
the court under this section shall not be taxed as part of the costs * * *.” R.C. 2941.51(D).
{¶ 6} In light of the language of R.C. 2941.51(D) and our cases interpreting that
provision, the trial court erred in ordering Breneman to pay for his legal representation as
costs. Because we have held that such compensation must be pursued in a separate civil
action, this portion of Breneman’s sentence will be vacated.
{¶ 7} The assignment of error is sustained.
{¶ 8} The portion of the trial court’s judgment that requires him to pay legal fees
as costs will be vacated. In all other respects, the judgment of the trial court will be
affirmed.
..........
FAIN, J. and WRIGHT, J., concur.
(Hon. Thomas R. Wright, Eleventh District Court of Appeals, sitting by assignment of the
Chief Justice of the Supreme Court of Ohio).
Copies mailed to:
4
Jennifer E. Geller
Barbara A. Lahmann
Hon. David C. Faulkner, Visiting Judge