DocketNumber: No. 552
Citation Numbers: 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 107
Judges: Pardee
Filed Date: 6/30/1922
Status: Precedential
Modified Date: 7/20/2022
Epitomized Opinion
Plaintiff Richards filed her petition setting up that here deceased husband in his "lifetime was seized of real estate described therein, she not having joined in conveying the same, the title to which is now in the names of the several defendants. On- April 21; 1921, the common pleas court held that she was, entitled to
2. That the assignment of dower is a chancery proceeding, and is appealable when the procedure designated by law for that purpose is followed.
3. The appeal bond was filed too late to bring up the judgment of April 21. . GC. 12226.
4. The hearing and overruling of the exceptions to the return of the commissioners and the orders made thereon were final, and of such force and effect that the parties have a right to appeal therefrom.
5. The appeals having vacated the judgment made it necessarily follows that the error proceedings as to those judgments must be dismissed and the error proceedings as to the prior orders not having been filed in time, it also follows that the error proceeding as a whole must be dismissed.
6. While the evidence offered in the lower court to impeach the report of the commissioners cast some doubt, it is not sufficient to warrant setting it aside.