DocketNumber： No. 9436
Judges： Dist, Farr, Funk, Jefferson, Lisbon, Ohio, Roberts, Wooster
Filed Date： 7/6/1928
Status： Precedential
Modified Date： 11/12/2024
There can be no question but that the “lowest responsible bid” means “not only the bid by the one whose pecuniary ability to perform the contract is best, but the one in point of skill, ability and integrity who is most likely to do faithful, conscientious work and fulfill the contract promptly according to its letter and spirit/’
The only question at issue as disclosed by the record and admissions and arguments of counsel is, did the Board make a reasonable effort to ascertain whether or not the lowest bidder was competent and fully qualified to properly and promptly perform the terms of the proposed contract.
The record wholly fails to show that the Board made any reasonable effort to ascertain the qualification of The Buehler Printcraft Company which was the lowest bidder, their bid being $5200.00 '.and the bid accepted being $7487.00 and upon which latter bid a contract is admittedly sought to he entered into.
From our examination of this record we are clearly of the opinion that the Board did not make a proper and reasonable effort to ascertain the qualifications of The Buehler Print-craft Company to perform the terms of the proposed contract to print the ballots for the primary election.
" Furthermore, the record shows that The Buehler Printcraft Company is fulfy equipped and qualified to perform the terms of the proposed Contract.
It therefore follows, and. this Court finds that the Board abused its discretion in accepting the hid of the defendant, the Brooks Company, and in attempting to enter into Contract with it. The injunction is therefore allowed and made perpetual as prayed for and an entry may be prepared similar, to the decree in Common Pleas Court except that the attorney fee allowed for plaintiff’s attorney is fixed at $300.00 which is to include his services in both Courts.