DocketNumber: No 2268
Citation Numbers: 14 Ohio Law. Abs. 223
Judges: Allread, Hornbeck, Kuñkle
Filed Date: 12/22/1932
Status: Precedential
Modified Date: 7/20/2022
This case was filed with the understanding on behalf of the court that there was no forfeiture clause in a contract of lease. It now appears that there is sübh a clause. It is true that counsel for plaintiff urges the allowance of the writ upon other grounds, to-wit upon the non-joinder of other necessary parties. We think, however, when the jurisdiction of the trial court is admitted that there is nothing further for a court to do in relation to the writ of prohibition. The writ is, therefore, refused.